State health agencies are on the front line in combatting the hazards of meth production. In the early years of the meth problem, health agencies' first encounter with drug labs was often in assisting law enforcement personnel who entered the labs. Unaware of the dangers of meth production, these first responders needed to learn to protect themselves from the toxic chemicals, and agencies had to formulate guidelines for lab cleanup. With the proliferation of meth, state health agencies' responsibilities have expanded to include educating the public, training and certifying workers, tracking meth labs, and licensing decontamination contractors. Health agencies are not only one of the first on the scene but are also the last, if and when meth sites are declared safe for reoccupancy.
The Association of State and Territorial Health Organizations (
ASTHO) issued an informative brief in June 2005,
Cleaning-up Clandestine Methamphetamine Labs: the Role of State Public Health Agencies (PDF, 364K, 5p.). The report makes reference to the Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance (
HSEES) system to collect and analyze information about releases of hazardous substances. (HSEES was established by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (
ATSDR), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (
DHHS)). Fifteen state health departments currently have agreements with ATSDR to participate in HSEES. According to the ASTHO report, five states (Iowa, Missouri, New York, Oregon, and Washington) use HSEES to collect and analyze data about injuries and deaths related to meth labs.
A sampling of state agency activities:
California. California's Department of Toxic Substances Control (
DTSC) conducts two complementary programs:
Clandestine Drug Lab Removals, for the emergency removal of chemicals and contaminated paraphernalia from labs, and a
Clandestine Drug Lab Remediation Program, for assessing and cleaning up former meth lab sites.
Iowa. Iowa's Dept. of Public Health (
IDPH) has published
Guidelines for Cleaning up Former Methamphetamine Labs (PDF, 31K, 6p.), in a user-friendly, Q&A format.
Minnesota. Minnesota's Dept. of Health (
MDH) provides a web site on
Methamphetamine and Meth Labs, which includes links to lab cleanup, laws and ordinances, and tips for property owners.
Missouri. Missouri's Dept. of Health and Senior Services (
DHSS) has published
Guidelines for Cleaning up Former Methamphetamine Labs (PDF, 625K, 8p.), virtually identical to Iowa's, but more user-friendly with color graphics.
New York. New York currently provides only general information on
meth, but
Gov. Pataki recently signed legislation for New York to take stronger steps. The new law directs the Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services (
OASAS) to establish a statewide education program on the dangers of using and producing meth, and for the Dept. of Environmental Conservation (
DEC) to be notified when a meth lab is discovered so they can implement cleanup procedures.
Oregon. Oregon's Dept. of Human Services (
DHS) has a
Drug Lab Cleanup Program whose homepage provides links to licensed contractors, drug lab properties, cleanup procedures, and tips for property owners.
Tennessee. Tennessee's Dept. of Environment and Conservation (
TDEC), under its
Division of Remediation,
Cleanup of Methamphetamine Contaminated Properties, has begun a
Registry of Methamphetamine Contaminated Properties (PDF, 59K. 1p.).
Washington. Washington's Dept. of Health (
DOH) has established a
Clandestine Drug Lab Program whose home page, among a wealth of information, links to a
Contaminated Properties List (Excel, 482K, 172p.)
This concludes the series.
Previous posts in
Meth Labs: Remediation and Disclosure Part 1: Public Concerns Part 2: Legislative responses